Battleduck: Background Material

In case you’re sane, and therefore don’t obsess over strange Canadian amphibious ATV-like conveyances, you’ve probably never heard of an Argo. My words scarcely do justice to these weird, ugly, awesome, funky, expensive, crude, critters. Here are a few photos I found randomly scattered about the ‘net.

  1. This is what the base mode, no frills, version looks like. Except they’re usually a shitty olive drab color. You’ll drop ten bills on one faster than you can say “why doesn’t it have a winch?” (Note: I only pay attention to 6×6 Argos. Most are 8×8, which is definitely cooler but completely out of my league.)
  2. This is the same basic machine with proper outfitting and spiffy but unnecessary camo. They will rake you over the coals for this option set! Such minor details as a proper seat-back and a winch launch the price upwards mercilessly. That said, it definitely changes the appearance from “mechanized beer cooler” to “tricked out epic exploratory craft”. Also, I travel solo and me owning anything without a winch is just asking for trouble. Still no ROPS.
  3. Here’s an older base model with tracks. Adding tracks to an Argo is much easier than adding them to an ATV. It’ll set you back maybe a couple grand, which is a fraction of the cost of tracks on an ATV. Installation is fairly easy and removal is equally easy. Tracks on an ATV, as awesome as they are, make me nervous. They have more moving parts than the Space Shuttle and are chock full of expensive delicate shit that will break when your ass is in the hinterland. Argo tracks are just as dumb and logical as you see here. I didn’t get to test it but they’re said to float over snow like a slow unstoppable snowmobile. Big selling point there. If you know (on day one) that you’ve got need for and funds to buy tracks… you might be well advised to start with an Argo. It might be cheaper than throwing money at an ATV which just wasn’t meant for tracks at its inception.
  4. A random shot of an Argo’s engine compartment. The engine is exactly unlike any normal ATV. That said, I see now they don’t really need any more power.
  5. Yes they are amphibious. Like drive it in a damn lake level amphibious! I tested it and it’s fuckin’ amazing! That said, the folks in this photo have got to be actors. No real humans have ever been dressed this identically for an actual outing in mud and water. Also, a helmet might be legally required or keep your noggin warm but I doubt you’ll ever go fast enough in an Argo to need impact resistance. YMMV but these things aren’t speedy roll over risks like an ATV.

About AdaptiveCurmudgeon

Adaptive Curmudgeon is handsome, brave, and wise.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Battleduck: Background Material

  1. Ralph Boyd says:

    Stop! Stop! I’m getting interested! Help, please!

  2. mack505 says:

    We have two of them at the firehouse. One is equipped for brush fire/deep woods work and the other has a stretcher mount for removing patients from the beach. We don’t use them often, but when we do nothing else compares. They sure beat lugging people over sand dunes by hand.

  3. Rob says:

    I had to look the machine up after you mentioned it.

    • AdaptiveCurmudgeon says:

      Now you know the Canadians are shipping a consumer grade amphibious all terrain tank to a mature market in the States. You cannot unlearn this knowledge.

  4. JFM says:

    I had an Argo 4×4 and loved it and learned a lot about them playing with it. Had to sell it because I trusted the wrong tax accountant. I look at the new ones from time to time, $30,000 yikes! One thing nobody seems to mention about tracks is that you need hub extenders to move the wheels away from the body.

    I often wonder if Argos are cheaper in Canada. You have contacts there, right?

    • AdaptiveCurmudgeon says:

      I have contacts but I don’t think Argos are cheaper anywhere. Once in a while I’ll see a basket case on Craigslist but I don’t need any more “projects”.

Leave a Reply